House Appropriations Committee Advances FY 25 Labor-HHS Bill

The Labor-HHS bill advanced out of the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday. The vote was 31-25, with all Democrats present opposed to the bill, which cuts spending by 11 percent compared to enacted FY 24 levels. The House Appropriations Committee’s press release also provides an overview of the markup and may be accessed here. The bill, report, amendments, and a four-page summary is available here.

House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) said Democrats will accept nothing less than a one percent increase for Labor-HHS, and each of the other bills. DeLauro released an updated fact sheet on revised subcommittee allocations, more fact sheets regarding the Labor-HHS bill, and sent a letter to her Democratic colleagues in which she again called for at least $786 billion in nondefense funding, said every additional dollar for defense will be matched by a dollar for nondefense, and stated the House Republican bills cut nondefense spending by more than $52 billion from FY 24 and leave more than $60 billion nondefense funding on the table.

Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray (D-WA) and Ranking Member Susan Collins (R-ME) agreed to add $34.5 billion in emergency spending. Of that amount, $21 billion would go to defense and $13.5 billion would go to domestic and foreign aid accounts. The additional emergency funds, and additional adjustments from the side deal negotiated last summer as part of the debt limit deal, could bring defense spending to $30 billion (3.4 percent) above FY 24, and bring nondefense spending at least $20 billion (2.7 percent) above FY 24. This differs significantly to House appropriations bills, in which defense would receive a one percent increase and nondefense would receive a six to seven percent cut compared to FY 24. Chair Cole said yesterday that he believes defense programs need more funding.

Both chambers of Congress are out next week for the Republican National Convention. House leaders hope to pass their Labor-HHS on the House floor prior to August recess, and Senate Appropriations Chair Murray has passed three bills in full committee, and the Labor-HHS bill is one of nine more FY 25 bills that need to be considered in full committee.

Inside Higher Ed: Rules Banning Transcript Holds, Expanding Overtime Now in Effect

A suite of new regulations governing higher education took effect Monday. Here’s what you should know about the key measures now in place—and the legal challenges they face. Several of those regulations and other changes that became effective July 1 are facing legal challenges, and some have been blocked. Whether they remain in place may depend on how federal courts interpret Friday’s Supreme Court ruling that limits the regulatory power of federal agencies—and on the outcome of the presidential election in November. -Inside Higher Ed

Read more here.

House Appropriators Release FY 25 Labor-HHS-ED Funding Bill

Today, the House Appropriations Committee’s Labor-HHS-ED Appropriations Subcommittee released the text of its FY 25 funding bill in anticipation of marking up the bill tomorrow at 8:00am. The bill is expected to pass through Subcommittee along party lines with amendments likely held until the full Committee markup on July 10th.

Overall, the FY 25 Labor-HHS bill provides 11 percent less funding than FY 24 enacted levels and is 15 percent below the President’s budget request.

The Department of Education would receive $68.1 billion, a decrease of $11 billion, or 14 percent, below the fiscal year 2024 level and $14.5 billion below the President’s FY 25 request. The bill would provide $22.5 billion for the Pell Grant program, equal to the 2024 level and $2.1 billion below the President’s FY 25 request, and $7,395 for the maximum Pell Grant award, equal to the 2024 level and $750 below the President’s FY 25 request.

The Department of Health and Human Services would receive $109.5 billion, a decrease of $7.5 billion, or 6.4 percent, below the FY 24 level and $9.7 billion below the President’s FY 25 request. The bill includes $7.4 billion for HRSA, a decrease of $647 million below 2024 levels (excluding Community Project Funding, also known as earmarks) and $892 million below the 2025 request.

Senate Appropriators have not yet released their spending allocations, nor a date for markup in subcommittee or full committee.

Please find links to Chair Aderholt’s press release and  bill text, as well as Republican and Democratic summaries. The markup can be viewed here.

In Memoriam: Richard Talbott, PhD

Richard Talbott, who retired as Dean of the Covey College of Allied Health Professions at the University of South Alabama, died over the Memorial Day weekend. He served as President of ASAHP in 2011-2013. His duties back then included guiding a seamless transition in 2012 entailing the retirement of the Association’s executive director to the hiring of a successor for that position and moving the organization’s headquarters to another location in Washington, DC.

Important activities undertaken during his period of leadership were both of an internal and external nature. Internally, he launched a revision of the Association’s Strategic Plan and used his parliamentary skills to modify the Policy & Procedures Manual. He helped plan the ASAHP Leadership Development Program that would be offered in 2013. He implemented a new Interdisciplinary Research Award to finance a means of positioning new scholars to seek larger extramural grants. He also oversaw a conversion to using a commercial firm to perform logistical duties electronically for an ever-growing number of new manuscript submissions to the Journal of Allied Health.
 
Externally, in 2012 he represented ASAHP in the newly established Institute of Medicine (IOM) Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education. The purpose of this endeavor was to engage key organizations in discussions to illuminate contemporary health profession education issues and create a mechanism to incubate and review new ideas. He worked with representatives of the Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors to discuss how to formalize and enhance communication between that organization and ASAHP. Common topics of interest included interprofessional education, simulation, clinical education hybrid models, and telehealth.
 
As a way of enhancing ASAHP’s activities on Capitol Hill, he was instrumental in creating a (PAC) Political Action Committee for the Association. Also, amicus briefs were filed in August 2012 and September 2013 for cases under consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court on the topic of affirmative action in higher education institutions.

House Appropriations Committee Releases Funding Allocations and Markup Schedule

House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-OK) announced his FY 25 funding allocations for each of the twelve Appropriations Subcommittees. Similar to last year, these allocations did not include additional funding from the “side deal” to the debt limit agreement. If included, it would have provided a 1% overall increase for domestic programs. However, without this side agreement, Cole states that the allocations reflect a 6% overall cut to domestic programs below last year’s levels, and the Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee would see a 10% cut below last year’s level. Chair Cole intends to mark up the Labor-HHS in Subcommittee is June 27 with Full Committee markup on July 10. 

House Democrats have already signaled their strong opposition to the proposed FY 25 funding allotments. House Appropriations Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) laid out the stark divide on nondefense spending in the House in her press release, which details the enacted $778 billion FY 24 nondefense spending line, compared to the no higher than $711 billion FY 25 level sought by House Republicans, and the at least $786 billion FY 25 level sought by House Democrats. DeLauro said any additional increases to defense funding must be paired with dollar-for-dollar increases in nondefense funding.


The House Republican allocations may be accessed here, and the markup schedule here. The House Democrat’s press release may be accessed here.

House Education Committee Holds Hearing on FY 25 Education Budget Request

On Tuesday, the House Education and Workforce Full Committee held a nearly four hour hearing on “Examining the Education Department’s Policies, Priorities, and FY 2023 Financial Audit Failure” with Education Secretary Miguel Cardona. The hearing was highly contentious, with a central focus on the FAFSA rollout, student loan forgiveness, Title IX rule, and college campus protests. Chair Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and her fellow Republicans stood firm on their stance against student loan forgiveness, often questioning the Department of Education’s Constitutional authority. Republicans raised concerns about additional regulations coming from the Department of Education, including Perkins and distance education.  A significant portion of the hearing focused on the protests on college campuses and the new Title IX rule. Other topics included federal workforce return to office, foreign influence on college campuses, transgender athletes, oversight on closed or merge colleges, mental health, illegal immigrants in the school system, homeless students, and IDEA.

Our hearing memo may be accessed here.

Department of Education Guidance on Title IV Discrimination

The Department of Education’s (ED) Office for Civil Rights issued new guidance through a Dear Colleague Letter to every school district and college in the country, providing examples of Antisemitic discrimination, as well as other forms of hate, that could lead to investigations for violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

A White House Fact Sheet may be accessed here. The Department of Education guidance may be accessed here.

House Education Committee to Hold Hearing with HHS Secretary

On Wednesday, May 15. at 10:15am Eastern, the House Education and the Workforce Committee will hold a hearing on the President’s FY 25 Budget Request, with testimony from HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra.

Sec. Becerra testified with the House Appropriations Committee’s Labor-HHS Subcommittee on March 20 (here), and later that day with the House Ways and Means Committee (here). He testified with the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Labor-HHS Subcommittee on April 16 (here).

The hearing may be viewed here.

Senate Appropriations Committee Holds Hearing on the President's FY 25 Education Budget Request

The Senate Appropriations Committee, Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee held a hearing titled, “A Review of the President’s Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request for the Department of Education” with testimony from Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona.

The hearing may be viewed here. Our memo on the hearing may be accessed here.

Senate Committee to Hold Hearing on Addressing the Shortage of Minority Health Care Professionals and the Maternal Health Crisis

On Thursday, May 2, at 10am Eastern, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) will hold a hearing titled, “What Can Congress Do to Address the Severe Shortage of Minority Health Care Professionals and the Maternal Health Crisis?”

The hearing may be viewed here.

Community Project Funding (Earmark) Request Opportunity

House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-OK) released earmark guidance and also extended the deadline for Members to submit their requests to the Committee. In a change from FY24, non-profits are no longer eligible in the Transportation-HUD Economic Development Initiative earmark account, though public institutions of higher education (public colleges and universities, including community colleges) are explicitly eligible.

The guidance may be accessed here.

ASAHP’s 2024 Regional Summit Promotes Dialogue Between Academic Institutions and Health Care Industry Partners to Improve Collaboration and Enhance Health Outcomes

Washington, D.C. - The Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions (ASAHP) announced that its fourth annual Regional Summit will take place across the country on May 23, 2024. The theme of the 2024 Summit, “Collaboration in Action - Engaging to Build Readiness for Interprofessional Clinical Practice,” aims to identify new strategies for collaboration between the healthcare industry and academic partners. ASAHP’s Regional Summits bring together academic leaders, faculty and health care providers from a variety of professional roles, disciplines, and organizations to share knowledge and best practices with the goal of improving the patient care experience and health outcomes as well as addressing clinician well-being, and health equity.

Rule Requiring Institutions to Provide Students with Geographically Accessible Clinical Opportunities to Go Into Effect July 1

Last Fall, the Department of Education issued a final rule on Financial Responsibility, Administrative Capability, Certification Procedures, Ability To Benefit (ATB). The rule goes into effect on July 1, 2024.

The rule includes language in the Administrative Capability section to add § 668.16(r) to require institutions to provide students with geographically accessible clinical or externship opportunities related to and required for completion of the credential or licensure in a recognized occupation, within 45 days of the completion of other required coursework.

Last Summer, prior to the rule being finalized, ASAHP submitted comments to the Department of Education, as well as joined a joint-comment letter led by the American Council on Education (ACE), both of which expressed concern with this language.

While ASAHP welcomes more accessible clinical opportunities, we informed the Department of Education that a requirement is not the best way to address the issue. An unintended consequence of this proposed language could be that institutions, to ensure compliance, may enroll only the number of students that the institution feels certain will have accessible clinical opportunities, decreasing access to postsecondary enrollment for allied health students at a time when the demand for allied health workers is expanding rapidly.

Unfortunately, the final rule, which goes into effect on July 1 still includes this requirement. Please find below the language included in the final rule:

Department of Education on what experiences the language applies to

This language applies to the clinical or externship experiences that are needed for students to complete their programs. Thus, experiences that occur as part of credential completion, such as those in the third or fourth year of a program or at the end of a program, would be included. It does not apply to post-graduation parts of the career ladder, which include things like the national residency program for graduates from medical school. The reference to how the externship or clinical is related to licensure in a recognized occupation is to note that some licensure requirements state that there must be a clinical or externship completed as part of the credential earned. The result is that residencies, clerkships, and other similar post-graduation experiences are not covered by this requirement.

Department of Education on the 45 day timeframe

The requirement is that institutions provide the students with the opportunity within 45 days of successful completion of other required coursework. That does not mean the experiences must start exactly within 45 days. However, the Department will consider whether a pattern where these experiences start well outside reasonable periods, e.g., offering a spot that starts in a year so the student has an extended gap after finishing their coursework is in fact a sign that an institution is not abiding by this requirement and does not have sufficient spots for clinical or externships and thus should result in a finding of a lack of administrative capability. We decline to adopt a longer timeframe. Making a student wait 90 days to receive their spot and then potentially waiting longer to begin that experience risks delaying their ability to complete their program and begin entering the workforce.”

Department of Education on geographic accessibility

The Department declines to provide a specific set of metrics for measuring what is geographically accessible, as there could be programs on the edge of one commuting zone or another and that different program types could have different expectations for what is geographically accessible. For example, a clinical experience tied to a highly specialized field as part of a graduate program may see a geographically accessible option as one that is in another part of the country. By contrast, a commuting zone concept is likely to be a better fit for certificate programs where students are more likely to be staying close to where they live. The Department also declines to remove the geographically accessible requirement. This is a critical concept to maintain because we do not want institutions to otherwise get out of providing the required clinical or externship options by simply offering students an opportunity that is completely infeasible for them to reach. We also remind commenters that this requirement only applies to precompletion situations, so concerns about how students with medical degrees participate in a national matching program would not be affected.

In terms of assessing geographic accessibility, the Department would consider how accessible distances look very different in rural areas versus urban ones. The level of the credential will also likely affect this consideration. Someone completing a professional degree in a highly specialized field is almost certainly going to have travel longer distances for a clinical and so something quite far away would still be viewed as accessible and in line with their expectations. By contrast, a student completing a 12-month certificate program is not likely expecting to move hundreds of miles away for a clinical experience. Nor would they be completing a credential with a level of specialization such that there may only be a handful of relevant placement options in the country. Preserving the concept of geographic accessibility while recognizing the need for flexibility in how that is considered based upon the credential level, type, and the physical location of the institution is appropriate.

The rule may be accessed here.

2024 ASAHP Election: Call for Candidates

ASAHP's annual election will be conducted this summer. The following positions are open for the 2024 election:

Board of Directors (three-year term) - 3 open positions

Treasurer (two-year term) - 1 open position

Nominations & Elections Committee (two-year term) - 3 open positions

Applications must be submitted here no later than Tuesday, April 30, 2024. Voting will begin Summer 2024.

Congressionally Directed Spending (Earmark) Request Opportunity

The Senate Appropriations Committee released guidance for Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) requests. The general guidance is here, Labor-H guidance is here, the list of Labor-H eligible agencies and accounts is here, the list of T-HUD eligible agencies and accounts is here. While Members set their own deadlines for receiving requests, the Senate Appropriations Committee set a May 13, 2024 deadline for Senators to submit their T-HUD requests, and a May 14, 2024 deadline for Senators to submit their Labor-H requests.

Administration Releases Student Debt Relief Plan, 30 Day Public Comment Period

On Tuesday, the Biden-Harris Administration released a preliminary rule on student debt relief for up to 30 million borrowers. The proposed rules will be formally published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, April 17 for a 30-day public comment period. In the coming weeks, the Administration is expected to release a second package of proposed rules, which will include a proposal for borrowers experiencing hardship.

The preliminary rule released Tuesday is here and the proposed rule released on Wednesday is here. A fact sheet from the Administration is available here. A press release from the Department of Education is available here.

House Appropriations Hearing on the Department of Education's FY 25 Budget Request

The House Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee held a wide-ranging and sometimes heated hearing on the Department of Education's budget request which focused on the Department’s rocky rollout of its new FAFSA application form. Several Republican Appropriators questioned whether FSA’s unprecedented loan forgiveness activities caused staff to be moved away from the implementation of the new FAFSA form, causing delays and challenges for institutions seeking to provide students with their financial aid awards. In addition, there were questions about the Department’s Title IX rulemaking and the role of transgender students in women college sports, challenges to free speech on college campuses, as well as the need for accountability with the funds directed to the Department.

Our hearing summary can be found here.